Headlines News :

Latest Post

Showing posts with label Vs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Vs. Show all posts

Nokia 808 PureView camera compared to the iPhone 4S and the HTC One X

Written By bama on Thursday, 14 June 2012 | 18:01



Nokia 808 PureView with its 41MP camera module got experiment shots along with the iPhone 4S and the HTC One X, and, as anticipated, was grapheme in terms of almost everything, especially point, low sluttish shots and sudden running target, thanks to its gigantic sensor, with the instruction slam state the only colourize mark on the change.

The folks that did the comparison noted that the apologize reminiscence was a bit colder than the jollier, solon soppy emblem from the separate two phones, to which they conventional a tell from Nokia's camera guru Damian Dinning himself, and the reply is couturier placard in its totality, as it reveals few pleasing advice for hereafter Nokia 808 PureView owners.

Hi, just wanted to take the opportunity to add some additional points to your comparison. Nokia conduct regular blind comparison tests using multiple devices including high end DSLR cameras, competitor smartphones and compact digital cameras and have done for many years. Through this we have gained a huge amount of experience and understanding in subjective personal preferences.

In the case of the N8, widely regarded as the benchmark before the introduction of the 808 PureView, we deliberately departed from the saturated colours ‘norm’ and optimised for a more natural look. The response to this was met with so much appreciation we wanted to use this as the basis of further development in the case of the 808. We also recognise that for some, images with more ‘punch’ may be preferred, a point you could argue is represented in your own commentaries. However, we remain convinced that for a large user group we expect to use the 808 we wanted to maintain the natural colour reproduction.

So for the first time we created two different colour optimisations. In full auto and scenes modes colour is reproduced with enhanced colour but not overly so. Whilst in creative we have followed the more natural colour optimisations we are passionate about preserving.Nokia recommend for the best all round experience use the 808 in its default 5mp setting. This will provide enhanced zoom capability, smaller file sizes for faster and easier sharing, greater levels of pixel oversampling and yet we believe based on our tests, still provide greater levels of details than any other smartphone. No doubt to create a level playing field I understand your choice in setting 8mp. 

However, this requires the use of the creative mode to gain access to the resolution setting. In doing so the natural colour optimisations a used as opposed to what would seem may have been preferred in your personal subjective view, the more colour enhanced setting provided by the auto or scenes mode options. In creative mode users are free to adjust the colour saturation and contrast settings as well as exposure compensation, should individual personal preferences differ from the default optimisations which were the results of capturing literally tens of thousands of test images across a wide variety of scenes.

Re close-up: The 808 uses the widest angle optics of any smartphone when used in its default fully optimised 16:9 aspect ratio. This does create something of a trade-off in close-ups. However, this is easily compensated for by use of the lossless zoom which of course is completely unique to the 808, a point I was surprised you made no reference to. Full zoom probably providing an end result with greater magnification than ‘broadly comparable’ smartphones.

Minimum focus is 15cm and this is achieved at all zoom settings unlike typical optical zooms. This shooting distance can be achieved through a variety of methods; close-up scene mode as a full time option, touch AF in any mode or close-up focus mode in creative accessed via a long touch of the viewfinder screen. Furthermore, as a result of the larger sensor, depth of field is reduced producing enhanced bokeh in close-ups, a further unique benefit many favour for separating the subject from the background.

Damian Dinning – Nokia

Superficial at the compare samples in the slideshow below, we can't support but speculate when faculty Nokia be transferral this photographic undergo on a Windows Phone telephone, be it in its rumored 12MP grade for a Verizon phone.
source: CNET via WMPU

                                                                          1.OutDoor

2.InDoor

3.Action

4.Macro

5.InDoor

6.Low Light

7.Low Light with Flash







Nokia 808 PureView vs Nokia N8 video sample comparisons emerge

Written By bama on Monday, 11 June 2012 | 03:21



The cameraphone to take the best pictures - Nokia 808 PureView - got announced two months and change ago at the MWC expo, and made it to the retail shelves last week. 

We've seen many promo shots and videos from it, mainly from Nokia itself, but now that it is available to purchase, we are expecting a bunch if improvised ones as well.

One of the most interesting things about the monster 41MP PureView camera module is how it compares with the previous imaging king in smartphones - the Nokia N8. Its 12MP sensor with Carl Zeiss lens and Xenon flash is nothing to sniff at, and now we have video samples that compare the new 808 PureView with the oldie but goldie Nokia N8. Color saturation and contrast are higher by default on the Nokia 808 PureView in the HD videos, while footage from the Nokia N8 looks better-lit, but it's the level of detail, clarity and framing space that ring in the main difference. 

Have a look for yourself in the video samples below, and marvel at the details and sharpness that Nokia 808 PureView can produce in low light conditions. Here's to this greatness arriving in a slimmer Windows Phone for Verizon.

source: PureViewClub





Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II

Written By bama on Thursday, 7 June 2012 | 03:44



In this comparison, we're using the international version of the Samsung Galaxy S III, which comes with a quad-core Exynos CPU and 1GB of RAM. The U.S. versions come with a dual-core Snapdragon S4 CPU and 2GB of RAM, as well as LTE, except for T-Mobile's, which lacks LTE.


Introduction:


The Galaxy S series of phones is the dream of every Android fan. Being the best of the best, these handsets have always represented the best that Android has to offer, mostly due to their spectacular specs sheets and real-life performance. The Samsung Galaxy S II, which came out last year, was so successful that it could hardly be challenged by any model that launched in the year following its release. However with this new breed of quad-core smartphones, Samsung had to refresh its otherwise still strong offering, by introducing a successor. That successor is, naturally, the Galaxy S III – a beast of a phone that comes to reaffirm Samsung's leading position and fight off the contenders looking to dethrone it.

However, since we know that a lot of you guys are still rocking that trusty GS II, we wanted to take a look at how the new model compares to the old one, and exactly how much of a reason there is in upgrading from the GS II to GS III.


Design:

The form-factor of the new handset might hold all the reasons you need to make the jump, but it might as well keep you away from the new Galaxy S. The reason we're saying this is because it's much bigger, due to having a much bigger screen. While the Galaxy S II can be seen as a compact phone these days (even though its 4.3” display was considered massive a year ago), the Galaxy S III is very big. In terms of usage comfort, it's obvious that the S II has an edge.

The Samsung Galaxy S III (left) and the Samsung Galaxy S II (right) - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
The Samsung Galaxy S III (left) and the Samsung Galaxy S II (right) - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
The Samsung Galaxy S III (left) and the Samsung Galaxy S II (right)

As far as materials and construction go, the S III and II are about equal. They are both made of plastic (though the plastic of the GS III should be of the polycarbonate type), and both feel solid enough when held in the hand. If you prefer a glossy finish, the Galaxy S III might appeal to you more, while the S II's plastic is matte. Both have strengths and weaknesses. For example, the glossy finish of the GS III will probably get a bit more attention, but it will also attract more fingerprints.

Bottom edges - The sides of the Samsung Galaxy S III (bottom, left) and the Samsung Galaxy S II (top, right) - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
Top - The sides of the Samsung Galaxy S III (bottom, left) and the Samsung Galaxy S II (top, right) - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
Left - The sides of the Samsung Galaxy S III (bottom, left) and the Samsung Galaxy S II (top, right) - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
Bottom edges
Top
Left
Right - The sides of the Samsung Galaxy S III (bottom, left) and the Samsung Galaxy S II (top, right) - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
Backs - The sides of the Samsung Galaxy S III (bottom, left) and the Samsung Galaxy S II (top, right) - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
Rear cameras - The sides of the Samsung Galaxy S III (bottom, left) and the Samsung Galaxy S II (top, right) - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
Right
Backs
Rear cameras
The sides of the Samsung Galaxy S III (bottom, left) and the Samsung Galaxy S II (top, right)


Display:

If you need a screen as large as possible on your cell phone, then upgrading to the new Galaxy S will be a no-brainer. With a gargantuan 4.8” panel, the Galaxy S III easily dwarfs the 4.3” Galaxy S II.

Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
Of course, with such an increase in size, the S III also needed a bump in resolution. That's why it's now sporting a 720x1280 res, guaranteeing a high pixel density of 306ppi. The pixel density with theGalaxy S II's 480x800 pixel resolution is just 218 ppi. However, the S II relies on the traditional RGB pixel arrangement, while the HD screen of the S III uses a PenTile matrix. The result of this is that the effective resolution of the S III isn't really 720x1280, but a bit lower. Still, it's high enough to make everything perfectly readable. There's a bit more pixelization observed with the display of the Galaxy  S II.

Both handsets use the Super AMOLED technology (the Galaxy S II actually uses Super AMOLED Plus, which means that it has the RGB matrix of which we told you in the previous paragraph). This basically guarantees having ultra-saturated colors and incredibly deep contrast levels, which is all cool. However, the good thing in the Galaxy S III is that it allows you to change the color saturation level. This way, if you prefer having more natural-looking colors, you can simply choose the “Natural” preset, which is missing on the GS II. Samsung has also improved the color temperature a bit with the Galaxy S III, which now sports slightly warmer colors, although there still room for improvement in this respect.

Samsung Galaxy S III :


Samsung Galaxy S II :



Interface:

At this point, both the Samsung Galaxy S III and S II run Android 4 ICS, but the versions of their TouchWiz interfaces are a bit different. The S III comes with a number of cool features designed to enhance you user experience. A good example here is S Voice – the Samsung alternative of Apple's Siri, or SmartStay. For more details on these, as well as the other new features in the Galaxy S III's TouchWiz Nature UX, please refer to our Samsung Galaxy S III Review.

The 
Samsung Galaxy S III comes with TouchWiz Nature UX on top of Android 4 
ICS - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
The 
Samsung Galaxy S III comes with TouchWiz Nature UX on top of Android 4 
ICS - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
The 
Samsung Galaxy S III comes with TouchWiz Nature UX on top of Android 4 
ICS - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
The 
Samsung Galaxy S III comes with TouchWiz Nature UX on top of Android 4 
ICS - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
The Samsung Galaxy S III comes with TouchWiz Nature UX on top of Android 4 ICS

The Samsung Galaxy S II is powered by TouchWiz 4.0 UI - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
The Samsung Galaxy S II is powered by TouchWiz 4.0 UI - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
The Samsung Galaxy S II is powered by TouchWiz 4.0 UI - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
The Samsung Galaxy S II is powered by TouchWiz 4.0 UI - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
The Samsung Galaxy S II is powered by TouchWiz 4.0 UI

All in all, both UIs are pretty much the same, with some mostly cosmetic refinements in the GS III.


Messaging:

One would think that typing on the bigger screen of the Galaxy S III will be much easier, but this isn't exactly the case. While the portrait keyboard is indeed bigger, we don't like the fact that the keys on the landscape QWERTY of the GS III are so small. Overall, there probably won't be a significant bump in typing speed if you get the new Galaxy S and use the stock keyboards. If you want to make the most of the 4.8” screen, it would be wise to search for a really god third-party QWERTY keyboard.

The on-screen keyboard of the Samsung Galaxy S III - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
The on-screen keyboard of the Samsung Galaxy S III - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
The on-screen keyboard of the Samsung Galaxy S III

The on-screen keyboard of the Samsung Galaxy S II - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
The on-screen keyboard of the Samsung Galaxy S II - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
The on-screen keyboard of the Samsung Galaxy S II


Internet:

Probably due to the faster quad-core processor and some optimization of the software, the browsing experience is superior on the Samsung Galaxy S III. Although they are pretty good on the GS II, scrolling and zooming are even smoother on the Galaxy S III.

Samsung has also made some polishing touches to the browser in the S III. For example, since the browser of the S II is a bit closer to the stock ICS browser, every time when you scroll upwards, the address bar pops-up at the top of the screen. Since this can get a bit annoying, Samsung has chosen to get rid of it in the S III, which is a smart move.

Surfing the web with the Samsung Galaxy S III - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
Surfing the web with the Samsung Galaxy S III - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
Surfing the web with the Samsung Galaxy S III - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
Surfing the web with the Samsung Galaxy S III - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
Surfing the web with the Samsung Galaxy S III

Surfing the web with the Samsung Galaxy S II - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
Surfing the web with the Samsung Galaxy S II - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
Surfing the web with the Samsung Galaxy S II - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
Surfing the web with the Samsung Galaxy S II - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
Surfing the web with the Samsung Galaxy S II


Processor and memory:

The processor is among the main hardware improvements made by Samsung in the new Galaxy S. While the 1.2GHz dual-core Exynos processor of the Galaxy S II was all the rage last year, 2012 is obviously the year of the quad-core CPUs. Because of that, the Galaxy S III ships with a faster, 1.4GHz quad-core Exynos 4412 processor, which is absolutely brilliant not only when it comes to benchmarks, but also in real-world performance.

The Galaxy S II is fluid and all, but the S III really takes things to the next level with its buttery-smooth animations and transitions, as well as ultra-fast loading times.

The amount of RAM on both devices is equal – 1GB, so there's no improvement in this area for the GS III.


Quadrant StandardAnTuTuNenaMark 2
Samsung Galaxy S III53351201658,6
Samsung Galaxy S II3113607651

The Galaxy S II comes in 16GB and 32GB flavors, whereas the Galaxy S III steps things up a bit with 16 GB, 32GB and 64GB versions. In addition, while on the GS II you can install microSDHC cards of up to 32GB in size, the GS III actually allows you to use microSDXC cards of up to 64GB. So if you have the habit of keeping your whole life stored on your mobile phone, the Galaxy S III should prove to be more suitable for you.


Camera:

Although the Galaxy S II was among the best camera phones of last year, we expected to see some kind of improvement with the Galaxy S III's 8MP camera. Well, it was actually pretty difficult for us to spot almost any difference between the shots we took with both handsets.

The camera interfaces are mostly the same, with some usability improvements made for the third iteration of the product, where some of the more frequently-used options have been made available from the main screen of the camera as well, for faster access. Besides, with the Galaxy S III, Samsung has added some new shooting modes like Burst shot, which is very useful if you're trying to shoot a quickly-moving object. It basically allows you to take a series of image in a very quick succession, and then easily choose the best one. Another mode that is missing on the GS II is HDR.

Camera interface of the Samsung Galaxy S III - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
Camera interface of the Samsung Galaxy S III - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
Camera interface of the Samsung Galaxy S III - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
Camera interface of the Samsung Galaxy S III - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
Camera interface of the Samsung Galaxy S III

Camera interface of the Samsung Galaxy S II - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
Camera interface of the Samsung Galaxy S II - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
Camera interface of the Samsung Galaxy S II - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
Camera interface of the Samsung Galaxy S II - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
Camera interface of the Samsung Galaxy S II

As we said, there's hardly any difference between the pictures of both handsets, in terms of details or exposure. The two cameras are performing in pretty much the same way. The only difference that we noticed is that the GS III seems to be taking slightly warmer shots, which is a good thing.

Samsung Galaxy S III - Samsung Galaxy S IIOutdoor samples - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
Samsung Galaxy S III - Samsung Galaxy S IIOutdoor samples - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
Samsung Galaxy S III - Samsung Galaxy S IIOutdoor samples - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
Samsung Galaxy S III - Samsung Galaxy S IIOutdoor samples - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
Samsung Galaxy S III - Samsung Galaxy S IIOutdoor samples - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
Samsung Galaxy S III
Samsung Galaxy S II - Samsung Galaxy S IIOutdoor samples - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
Samsung Galaxy S II - Samsung Galaxy S IIOutdoor samples - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
Samsung Galaxy S II - Samsung Galaxy S IIOutdoor samples - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
Samsung Galaxy S II - Samsung Galaxy S IIOutdoor samples - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
Samsung Galaxy S II - Samsung Galaxy S IIOutdoor samples - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
Samsung Galaxy S II
Samsung Galaxy S III - Samsung Galaxy S IIOutdoor samples - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
Samsung Galaxy S III - Samsung Galaxy S IIOutdoor samples - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
Samsung Galaxy S III - Samsung Galaxy S IIOutdoor samples - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
Samsung Galaxy S III - Samsung Galaxy S IIOutdoor samples - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
Samsung Galaxy S III - Samsung Galaxy S IIOutdoor samples - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
Samsung Galaxy S III
Samsung Galaxy S IIOutdoor samples - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
Samsung Galaxy S IIOutdoor samples - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
Samsung Galaxy S IIOutdoor samples - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
Samsung Galaxy S IIOutdoor samples - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
Samsung Galaxy S IIOutdoor samples - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
Samsung Galaxy S II
Outdoor samples

Strong - Samsung Galaxy S III - Samsung Galaxy S II - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
Medium - Samsung Galaxy S III - Samsung Galaxy S II - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
Low light - Samsung Galaxy S III - Samsung Galaxy S II - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
Darkness with flash - Samsung Galaxy S III - Samsung Galaxy S II - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
Strong
Medium
Low light
Darkness with flash
Samsung Galaxy S III
Samsung Galaxy S II - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
Samsung Galaxy S II - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
Samsung Galaxy S II - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
Samsung Galaxy S II - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
Samsung Galaxy S II
The 1080p video shot with both handsets is also pretty similar, which means that the GS III is very good in that respect, but doesn't really introduce us to great improvements. Anyways, the image quality with the Galaxy S III is indeed a bit better, probably due to the better exposure of the scene.

Samsung Galaxy S III Sample Video:



Samsung Galaxy S II Sample Video:



Samsung Galaxy S III Indoor Sample Video:



Samsung Galaxy S II Indoor Sample Video:




Multimedia:

Both the Galaxy S III and S II are multimedia powerhouses... but we guess what you want to know is how/if the Galaxy S III is better? Well, obviously, the GS III will be much more appropriate for those of you watching a lot of movies or playing a lot of games, thanks to its larger, and slightly brighter 4.8” screen.

Other than that, on software level the GS III comes with fancier music and video players, but nothing that you can't get from Google Play. Both phones will play up to 1080p videos for you. Another asset that would reaffirm the GS III as the better multimedia handset is found with the option of purchasing it with 64GB of internal memory, as well as the microSDXC card slot. Basically, all of this will allow you to store more music and video on your device.

The built-in music player of the Samsung Galaxy S III - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
The built-in music player of the Samsung Galaxy S III - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
The built-in music player of the Samsung Galaxy S III - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
The built-in music player of the Samsung Galaxy S III - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
The built-in music player of the Samsung Galaxy S III

The Music player of Samsung Galaxy S II - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
The Music player of Samsung Galaxy S II - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
The Music player of Samsung Galaxy S II - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
The Music player of Samsung Galaxy S II - Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
The Music player of Samsung Galaxy S II

Performance:

Samsung Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S II
Both devices are very good when it comes to making phone calls. Using the Galaxy S II as a solid base, Samsung has improved the sound of the Galaxy S III by implementing a special EQ which makes voices coming through the handset's earpiece sound more natural. Otherwise, both devices are loud enough, so you shouldn't have problems hearing the person on the other end of the line.

The same goes for the quality of the outgoing sound. While both phones have noise-cancellation technology, the GS III works superbly by filtering out pretty much every sound coming from your noisy ambiance.

According to official specs, the Galaxy S II's 1650mAh battery should be enough to deliver 9 hours of 3G talk-time and 25.8 days of stand-by, which is a pretty good achievement. Unfortunately, Samsung hasn't released official numbers for the battery life of the GS III. While the new Galaxy S sports a significantly larger, 2100mAh battery, we shouldn't forget that it also comes with a bigger screen and faster processor that, when used at full power, consumes quite a lot of power. After we tested both handsets, we came to the conclusion that you can expect similar results with them. With moderate and more battery-cautious usage, you should be able to get up to 2 days out of your handset on a single charge. If you're a heavy user, though, prepare to charge every night.


Conclusion:

To sum it all up, there are a number of reasons why upgrading to the Galaxy S III would be good for you. The most important one is the bigger, higher-resolution screen, which will make consumption of multimedia that much more enjoyable.

The other reason is the quad-core Exynos processor, which is basically future-proof right now. Although the dual-core CPU found on the GS II is still pretty good, with these quad-core SoCs around, it might soon find itself lacking enough power to provide smooth performance with heavier apps and games. 

The third reason is the refined software on the GS III, in the form of TouchWiz Nature UX. The new UI looks and runs better, while adding a few cool features to further enhance your experience of using the phone. Still, with the Galaxy S II running Ice Cream Sandwich, and with many third-party launchers being available on Google Play, GS II users aren't really missing too much in this respect.

If you can live without those features, well, we guess you can stick to your trusty Galaxy S II for a little longer, until even more capable smartphones start showing up. However, if the Galaxy S III turns out to be as successful as its predecessor, we have the feeling that you might have to wait quite a bit until something better arrives on the scene.


 
Support : Creating Website | Johny Template | Mas Template
Copyright © 2011. Fones Arena - Phone news,Reviews and Specs - All Rights Reserved
Template Created by Creating Website Published by Mas Template
Proudly powered by Blogger